Immigration and Integration: Does Multiculturalism Really Exist?

As I slump into yet another underground seat on yet another tube, on yet another drizzly, dismal morning I hear the faint chatter of other passengers as my eyes become heavy and begin to close. As I doze I can’t help but notice the variety of voices in the carriage. I detect at least three different languages, two of which I couldn't even recognise. Then it hits me- London is full of diverse cultures, customs, traditions and religions, which surely make it multicultural, right?

Grounded in Our Own Realities

For some communities, cultural diversity simply does not exist. This may be because they are set in their archaic ways, but what if I said such diversity doesn’t really exist in large modern, thriving places such as Manchester, Birmingham and London. Consider those who refuse to acknowledge integration let alone get involved with it, instead sticking to their personal preferences and habits. Many appear so grounded in their own reality that they fail to recognise others’ values and beliefs. On the other hand, others are exceedingly proud about their beliefs or culture and desperately attempt to attract others to their way of life, perhaps somewhat forcefully.

By definition multiculturalism can derive from immigration but when good old-fashioned ignorance comes into play, do either even stand a chance? Although there may be more and more cultures in the UK, it’s no secret that there’s an incredible stigma attached to immigration and much debate regarding what constraints should be put into place to control immigration numbers. Some people are of the opinion that it is unfair for those not of British birth to receive somewhere to live, assistance finding employment and various benefits. Recently the Conservative Party have recently cracked down on EU immigrant benefits despite the fact that European Immigrants paid 34% more in tax than they received in benefits last year.

Immigration in History

Arguably there were no immigration or border control issues in the US pre-World War One (around 1914), instead there was a free movement in every sense of the word. After the war many countries seemed less sympathetic as many were war-torn, diseased wastelands less equip to deal with those seeking refuge. Now, immigration is just like any other permit; it allows you to live, learn and trade in another country, but it’s currently perceived by many as a plague on society’s development as immigrants ravage jobs and resources. Yet the fact is they are actually more likely to boost British economy by providing new services and goods that the current market is unable to, perhaps even forming a niche of fresh demands.

Indecisiveness with Immigration

It was recently reported in The Independent that Nick Clegg has been “scapegoating immigrants...”. The Lib Dem leader has conducted “...his most unforgivable Tory collaboration yet.” due to the fact that he spoke of an amnesty for illegal immigrants but has now jumped on the Tory bandwagon of blaming immigrants for Britain’s problems rather than the Police, Bankers, Politicians etc. It seems the Conservatives know how unlikely they are to win the next election and are consequentially playing on public fears.

The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) suppose that immigrants contribute approximately £16.27billion to the British economy every year, despite the fact that immigration in the UK fell in June 2013 leaving the total around 182,000 compared to just over 160,000 at the same time in 2012. It seems the government simply cannot meet demand although they aim to wheedle the total down to 100,000 by 2015.

The fact is that each and every one of us is responsible for making the leap from multiculturalism to integration but the question remains whether when someone changes their country of residence, it means their sense of self (culture, religion etc) are less significant. However, BBC Radio4 reported that 80 million people are thought to not be living in the country of their birth.

Britain’s Buried Origins

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) found that over a third of asylum seekers are students, making it plain that these young people are searching for a better life and better future. Therefore, it’s disastrous to discover that ‘Islamaphobia’ is now socially acceptable on our shores. According to the Aljazeera website, white Britons may soon become a minority in Britain which has triggered terror amongst many causing them to become concerned about the future of the country. Britain is built on cultures failing to integrate, which is odd considering we’re a culture composed of a cocktail of immigrants and invaders, raising the question of what something inherently British actually is.

We are able to see how much the British government despise immigrants from our current legal system the United Kingdom Border Agency introduced a civil penalty system in February 2008 for employers who have an illegal immigrant working for them, which allows a penalty of up £10,000 per illegal employee for those committing this heinous crime. Other penalties may include the employer being downgraded on the register of sponsors or the employer’s licence being cancelled and removed from the register so they are unable to bring any workers to UK or keep any workers who are migrants.

This is the issue with population growth through immigration; on the one hand it is not possible to support a regulated immigration policy since government actions in Britain are rarely legitimate or moral. This is because the only reason we as citizens can stop people from freely moving on to land, is to prevent a violation of property rights and since our government cannot hold any land. They have no right be prevent people from entering our country, and when it does, it is committing an immoral act of violence against this person, and restricting them of their natural rights, which has led to the viewpoint of “open boarders”.

The term multiculturalism does not account for the questionable beginnings of Britain built on war and invasion, and real integration is unlikely to occur if this is not recognised. It’s a term used to excess by Western politicians to entice those living in other countries to our shores as and when they desire. But once current citizens begin complaining or someone needs to be blamed for Britain’s problems, immigrants are an easily and defenseless target.

EP Review: Amberline- ‘The Art of Reinvention’ (30/09/2013- Self-Released)

Hailing from Guildford, Surrey, Pop Punkers Amberline high-energy five piece influenced by the likes of A Day to Remember, New Found Glory and Blink-182. Their debut ‘Soundtrack of Your Life’ hit shelves back in 2011 and the quintet’s latest EP ‘The Art of Reinvention’ hit digital music stands on September 30^th and it’s no surprise they’ve caused quite a commotion in their quiet hometown by recently describing their music as “Michael Jackson two-stepping on your mum’s face”.

Right from the off, it’s obvious this EP is going to be somewhat generic both melodically and lyrically. Although the light breakdowns in ‘I’m a Grower, Not a Show-er’ are apt, the lyrics simply do not cut it. In fact, the track sounds so much like Good Charlotte’s early work it’s uncanny. But there is no denying that Amberline know what they’re doing, and perhaps have just gripped the mantra of ‘If it ain’t broke then don’t fix it.’ The track even comes to as monotone end with gang vocals chorusing “f*ck you.”

‘The Art of Reinvention’, the band claim, is a brave redefinition of old-school Pop Punk, but it actually appears there’s been very little redefining going on. ‘Years Gone By’ follows in the same fashion, with speedy yet steady drum beats driving the standard melody and breakdowns during the Bridge. With its typically Emo title, ‘The Lost and the Hopeless’ starts steadily with strikingly subtle guitaring that rapidly smashes into a blasting verse forming a monstrous chorus. With infectious hooks, big guitar solos and a typically catchy chorus, this track is certainly a stand-out song. Credit where credit’s due, Amberline have stuck like the glue to their Pop Punk genre, which is something so many bands and artists fail to do; they know how they want to come across, who they what to be as a band and what they want their sound to be.

The well-crafted melody of ‘When All Else Fails’ seamlessly blends harmonies, brashing guitars and drums and raw, punchy main vocal lines. The production quality is also clear as the song comes to a close and the gang vocals become crystal clear and well-coordinated. Although ‘Here Comes the Colonel’ is definitely the filler track of the EP, ‘Fingers Crossed’ brings a burst of solid optimism to the table to finish on.

Despite how well-crafted and energetic ‘The Art of Reinvention’ is, Amberline seem to lack individuality. They come across as passionate and hugely diligent musicians who just don’t possess the desire to be different, but you never know what they might try reinventing in theit future.

3.5/5

Revolutionaries, Radicles and Politics of the Outsider- What is Radical in the Political World?

With regards to unconventional political stances, the main aspect to consider is radical politicians and their views. Those with radical political views range from being in utter opposition to existing mainstream political system and state and seeking to hack away at it in any way possible, to regarding those in power as benevolent being compared to all other citizens. Although many members of the public believe that there is no extremism linked to modern politics and the State simply provides us with food, shelter and support, there has been a particularly noticeable build-up of alternative political views since the recession hit British shores back in 2008. As citizens have become more and more frustrated with politicians failing to meet acceptable standards of service, a more progressive and revolutionary approach to politics has been initiated.

From Ron Paul to Russell Brand- Present Political Revolutionaries

Ron Paul is a former American politician, as well as author and physician who attempted to revolutionise the American political system during his time as a Congressman in Texas, which came to an end earlier this year. He claimed that “…mainstream media is not telling the stories that Americans need to know” and that Western politics is whitewashed to protect the public from the painful truth of the world that we live in. Paul’s approach was to simply highlight the snags in mainstream politics for the public to be aware of and gain an opinion of, and then inevitably change the system as it currently stands so it actually carries out the purpose it was designed for- to provide the help that the public need for modern life.

Ron Paul

It is also important to note that politically-passionate individuals or groups do not necessarily have to be radical to make a radical change. For instance, Ron Paul’s radical hatred of the State has done more practically for the cause of liberty and freedom without ever crossing the slightly blurred boundaries between conventional and radical politics.

Even more recently, Comedian Russell Brand has been conducting recent political outbursts that lean towards fighting for more power and money for politicians to help the poor and neglected members of society. Although many may only consider the likes of Hitler and Stalin as revolutionaries, Brand has underlined the “insignificant” differences between current mainstream British political parties as the schemes they carry out are ineffective no matter whether they are left or right-wing associated. He also stated, “The only reason to vote is if the vote represents power or change. I don't think it does. I fervently believe that we deserve more from our democratic system than the few derisory tit-bits tossed from the carousel of the mighty, when they hop a few inches left or right.”

Brand also joined a million other protestors in the Million Mask March on the evening of 11^th November against financial cuts for the public, general corruption and increased surveillance. He was spotted sporting a Guy Fawkes mask. Hacktivist group Anonymous claimed the march in Whitehall and Trafalgar Square aimed to “…spark the movement back into action against the persecution of internet freedom”. In his recent Newsnight interview with Jeremy Paxman, Russell Brand claimed that the current political system is “broken” and stressed a revolutionary by the people was needed. The interview has over 9 million views on YouTube.

Russell Brand

Believe it or not, Che Guevara was a in fact, mass murdering Totalitarian Socialist who killed many black people, killed and banished many Jazz and Rock musicians because he did not enjoy those particular genres. However he still remains a symbol of pop culture for many within the Western world, most likely simply due to pure ignorance.

Anarchism, Capitalism and Communism

Anarchism is defined as “A doctrine urging the abolition of government or governmental restraint as the indispensable condition for full social and political liberty.” But the word anarchy itself simply means a lack of hierarchy. Two types of Political Anarchists are Anarco-Capitalists and Libertarians, which pretty much go hand-in-hand in terms of NAP (Non-aggression principles), held by those who follow these political systems.  These beliefs also suggest that aggressive tactics to gain more or overall political control are illegitimate as they are closely linked to people’s lives, property and liberty.

Economists such as Ludwig Von Mises, Robert P. Murphy and Murray Rothbard utterly despise the State and labelled those who are part of it as robbers, enslavers and murderers who take advantage of citizens through taxation, or even more extreme schemes such as illegal wars and executions to gain control over society. Yet the State is designed to provide a systematic, legal and orderly channel for people and their property, but Anarcho-Capitalists believe that services the state provide should benefit those who hold political power as well as the general public. Anarcho Communists however, hold the opinion that the abolition of Capitalism, wages and private property (while retaining respect for personal property) would help boost the current political methods in the West.

The line between what is conventional and therefore accepted by the general public is more blurred than many may think. Revolutionaries and radicals are more ordinary than they appear at first glance simply because there is very little extremism in middle-of-the-road Western politics. As many believe the current system is inoperative, a change in the democracy we know in Britain may just be inevitable. 

Facebook- The Relationship Wrecker

With instant communication physically within our reach, relationships are arguably harder than ever to maintain in modern society. Romantic relationships in particular can be very treacherous when Social Media gets involved, which is happening to more and more couples given the fact that Match.com claims 1 in 5 relationships now start online. The internet makes cheating far easier to carry out but not so easy to hide- unless you’re cautious with your passwords that is!

Social Media can create a false sense of intimacy between people, allow you to connect with people the world over, and cause you to compare yourself and your lifestyle with that of other people that you know. With regards to relationships between couples, a study in a recent issue of the Journal of Cyber-psychology, Behaviour and Social Networking found that people who use Facebook excessively (interpreted by the researchers as checking it more than hourly) are more likely to "...experience Facebook–related conflict with their romantic partners, which then may cause negative relationship outcomes including emotional and physical cheating, break-up and divorce.”

Some people also opt to have a true self and online self, as well as effectively lead a double life thanks to the easy access Social Media provides to such choices. In Britain, 71% of households have a broadband connection, so it’s time to face up to the fact that there’s no escape from Facebook and the like. Social Media has also been an unprecedented distraction to employees within the workplace as well as those in relationships simply because the temptation is so effortless to experience. You can add someone on Facebook, follow them on Twitter and stalk them online ‘til the sun goes down, but the question is can you really know a person based on either their physical self or online self? Because it’s no secret that Social Media users tend to exaggerate the excitement they have in their personal and professional lives.

The online dating industry is said to be worth £2 billion a year and despite it being thought that half of all marriages end in divorce, it’s staggering how much the industry has boomed over the last decade. But this is likely to have caused an amplification of paranoia, with some couples even allowing one another to log onto one another’s email accounts, blogs and Social Media pages to have a butchers at their recently activity.Digital dating is seen by some as a vital part in a society where the methods of forming relationships are grossly inefficient, according to psychologists from the University of Rochester in the U.S. “Online dating is definitely a new and much-needed twist on relationships” said Harry Reis; who worked on a report with The Daily Telegraph, along with five authors and a professor in psychology. 

Facebook, Tumblr and Twitter in particular, have changed the dating scene severely. Along with dating websites, Social Media sites mean there’s no more sitting by the phone waiting that call; you can instantly contact online and keep in touch as much or as little as you want, which can have both positive and negative effects on your relationship. For instance, talking online makes it easier, faster and cheaper to chat in between seeing each other in person, and therefore get to know one another a little more. Yet if it’s made use of too much, Social Media can have a detrimental effect on friendships and romantic relationships alike. 

It’s also interesting to note how much people take your cyber-space activity into account, especially with relationships. Say you've just nabbed yourself a new girlfriend or boyfriend; very few people are aware of it until you shove it on your Facebook profile. But the beauty of that is you can control who is aware of your personal business without editing your privacy settings online; it’s all done face-to-face.

The easy-come, easy-go mentality towards relationships make work for some, but it’s all dependant on how to use Social Media when you’re in a relationship. If you use it to simply keep in touch with each other it can be beneficial to the development of your relationship, but if it can also be the cause of severe screaming matches and even cause the relationship to end.